|
Johns Hopkins University Hospital1
|
Pre
Test
|
Test
|
Post
Test
|
Handwashing
compliance
|
19%
|
27%
|
24%
|
Infection
rate
|
9.4%
|
7.5%
|
5.6%
|
Biloxi
Specialty Hospital
|
Pre Test
|
Test
|
Post Test
|
Handwashing compliance
|
6.8%
|
8.9%
|
9.5%
|
Infection rate
|
22%
|
13%
|
13%
|
Hand Hygiene Monitoring
increased hand hygiene compliance and decreased Healthcare Associated Infections
(HAIs) because healthcare workers (HCWs) and visitors, at
both sites, washed or sanitized at subsequent opportunities, rather
than returned to wash upon hearing a message. HHM
prompted for hand hygiene on room entry at BSH and hand
hygiene increased there when prompts began, but increased even more on room
exit. Hand hygiene remained high at both sites in the Post test phase,
without voices.
The results suggest that users were taught to wash, rather than were
coerced to wash.
Patients who hear Hand Hygiene Monitor
messages take an active role in their own care by reminding HCWs to
wash
their hands. Users accept HHM prompts
without irritation because they understand that the messages
only remind the to adhere to their training.
1 Swoboda et al., 2004.
|